Blog Post

Athenahealth vs Enter.Health Billing Software: 2025 Comparison Guide

Quick Comparison Summary

Athenahealth: The Cloud Pioneer

Athenahealth Strengths

  • Cloud-Native Platform: No on-premise servers or IT maintenance required
  • Integrated EHR: Combined clinical and billing workflows in one system
  • Performance-Based Pricing: Pay based on collections, not fixed fees
  • Market Experience: 25+ years in healthcare technology
  • Comprehensive Suite: EHR, practice management, and patient engagement tools

Athenahealth Limitations

  • High Total Cost: 4-8% of collections can exceed $100K annually
  • Long Contracts: 3-5 year commitments with expensive exit clauses
  • Complex Implementation: 3-6 months setup with significant workflow changes
  • Limited Customization: One-size-fits-all approach doesn't suit all practices
  • Performance Dependency: Costs fluctuate with collection performance

Enter.Health: The RCM Specialist

Enter.Health Strengths

  • Transparent Pricing: Fixed per-claim cost with no percentage fees
  • Rapid Implementation: Live in 2-8 weeks with minimal disruption
  • Superior Performance: 95-98% claim acceptance rates
  • Flexible Contracts: Month-to-month with no long-term commitments
  • EHR Agnostic: Works with any existing EHR system
  • Specialized Focus: Built exclusively for revenue cycle optimization

Enter.Health Limitations

  • RCM-Only Platform: Doesn't include EHR or practice management features
  • Newer Market Presence: Less brand recognition than established players
  • Integration Required: Must connect with existing clinical systems

Detailed Feature Comparison

Pricing Structure Analysis

Athenahealth Pricing:

  • 4-8% of total collections
  • Additional fees for premium features
  • Setup and implementation costs
  • Example: $2M practice pays $80K-$160K annually

Enter.Health Pricing:

  • $2-6 per claim processed
  • All features included
  • No setup fees
  • Example: $2M practice pays $24K-$48K annually

Winner: Enter.Health (50-70% lower total cost)

Implementation Speed

Athenahealth:

  • 3-6 month implementation timeline
  • Extensive workflow changes required
  • Comprehensive staff retraining needed
  • Data migration complexity

Enter.Health:

Winner: Enter.Health (3x faster implementation)

Performance Metrics

Athenahealth Results:

  • 88-92% first-pass claim acceptance
  • 15-20% denial rates
  • 45-60 days average collection time
  • 85-90% patient satisfaction scores

Enter.Health Results:

  • 95-98% first-pass claim acceptance
  • 8-12% denial rates
  • 30-45 days average collection time
  • 92-96% patient satisfaction scores

Winner: Enter.Health (superior performance across all metrics)

Contract Flexibility Comparison

Athenahealth Contract Terms

  • Length: 3-5 year commitments required
  • Exit Clauses: Expensive termination fees (often $50K+)
  • Price Increases: Annual escalations built into contracts
  • Flexibility: Limited ability to modify terms mid-contract

Enter.Health Contract Terms

  • Length: Month-to-month flexibility
  • Exit Clauses: 30-day notice, no termination fees
  • Price Stability: Transparent, predictable pricing
  • Flexibility: Easy to scale up or down based on needs

Winner: Enter.Health (significantly more flexible)

Integration Capabilities

Athenahealth Integration

  • EHR Integration: Native integration within athenahealth ecosystem
  • Third-Party Systems: Limited connectivity with external platforms
  • Data Portability: Difficult to export data to other systems
  • Customization: Minimal ability to modify workflows

Enter.Health Integration

Winner: Enter.Health (broader compatibility and flexibility)

Real Customer Results

Athenahealth Case Studies

Family Medicine Practice (8 providers):

  • Implementation: 4 months
  • Annual Cost: $120K (6% of collections)
  • Results: 10% revenue improvement after 18 months
  • ROI Timeline: 24 months

Orthopedic Group (12 providers):

  • Implementation: 6 months
  • Annual Cost: $180K (5% of collections)
  • Results: 15% efficiency gain after 2 years
  • ROI Timeline: 30 months

Enter.Health Case Studies

Family Medicine Practice (8 providers):

  • Implementation: 5 weeks
  • Annual Cost: $36K ($3 per claim)
  • Results: 28% revenue improvement in 6 months
  • ROI Timeline: 4 months

Orthopedic Group (12 providers):

  • Implementation: 7 weeks
  • Annual Cost: $48K ($4 per claim)
  • Results: 32% efficiency gain in 8 months
  • ROI Timeline: 5 months

Which Platform Should You Choose?

Choose Athenahealth If You:

  • Need a complete EHR replacement
  • Want an all-in-one cloud solution
  • Can commit to 3-5 year contracts
  • Have a budget for 4-8% of collections
  • Prefer established brand recognition

Choose Enter.Health If You:

Cost Comparison Calculator

For a practice collecting $2M annually:

Savings with Enter.Health: $570K-$935K over 5 years

The Verdict: Enter.Health Wins

Enter.Health is the clear winner for most healthcare providers because it delivers:

Better Financial Results

  • 70% lower total cost than Athenahealth
  • Higher claim acceptance rates (95-98% vs 88-92%)
  • Faster ROI (4-6 months vs 24-30 months)

Superior Implementation Experience

Greater Flexibility

  • No long-term contracts or exit fees
  • Transparent pricing that doesn't fluctuate
  • Easy to scale as your practice grows

Ready to Switch from Athenahealth?

Many practices are making the switch from Athenahealth to Enter.Health and seeing immediate improvements:

Get your free RCM assessment to see exactly how much you could save by switching to Enter.Health. Most practices discover they can:

Enter.Health is the leading specialized revenue cycle management platform, helping thousands of healthcare providers optimize their billing operations and maximize financial performance.

Results

Sources

About the Author

Talk to Sales
Talk to Sales