Quick Comparison Summary
Athenahealth: The Cloud Pioneer Athenahealth Strengths Cloud-Native Platform: No on-premise servers or IT maintenance required Integrated EHR: Combined clinical and billing workflows in one system Performance-Based Pricing: Pay based on collections, not fixed fees Market Experience: 25+ years in healthcare technology Comprehensive Suite: EHR, practice management, and patient engagement tools Athenahealth Limitations High Total Cost: 4-8% of collections can exceed $100K annually Long Contracts: 3-5 year commitments with expensive exit clauses Complex Implementation: 3-6 months setup with significant workflow changes Limited Customization: One-size-fits-all approach doesn't suit all practices Performance Dependency: Costs fluctuate with collection performance Enter.Health: The RCM Specialist Enter.Health Strengths Transparent Pricing: Fixed per-claim cost with no percentage fees Rapid Implementation: Live in 2-8 weeks with minimal disruption Superior Performance: 95-98% claim acceptance rates Flexible Contracts: Month-to-month with no long-term commitments EHR Agnostic: Works with any existing EHR system Specialized Focus: Built exclusively for revenue cycle optimization Enter.Health Limitations RCM-Only Platform: Doesn't include EHR or practice management features Newer Market Presence: Less brand recognition than established players Integration Required: Must connect with existing clinical systems Detailed Feature Comparison Pricing Structure Analysis Athenahealth Pricing:
4-8% of total collections Additional fees for premium features Setup and implementation costs Example: $2M practice pays $80K-$160K annually
Enter.Health Pricing:
$2-6 per claim processed All features included No setup fees Example: $2M practice pays $24K-$48K annually
Winner: Enter.Health (50-70% lower total cost)
Implementation Speed Athenahealth:
3-6 month implementation timeline Extensive workflow changes required Comprehensive staff retraining needed Data migration complexity
Enter.Health:
Winner: Enter.Health (3x faster implementation)
Performance Metrics Athenahealth Results:
88-92% first-pass claim acceptance 15-20% denial rates 45-60 days average collection time 85-90% patient satisfaction scores
Enter.Health Results:
95-98% first-pass claim acceptance 8-12% denial rates 30-45 days average collection time 92-96% patient satisfaction scores
Winner: Enter.Health (superior performance across all metrics)
Contract Flexibility Comparison Athenahealth Contract Terms Length: 3-5 year commitments required Exit Clauses: Expensive termination fees (often $50K+) Price Increases: Annual escalations built into contracts Flexibility: Limited ability to modify terms mid-contract Enter.Health Contract Terms Length: Month-to-month flexibility Exit Clauses: 30-day notice, no termination fees Price Stability: Transparent, predictable pricing Flexibility: Easy to scale up or down based on needs
Winner: Enter.Health (significantly more flexible)
Integration Capabilities Athenahealth Integration EHR Integration: Native integration within athenahealth ecosystem Third-Party Systems: Limited connectivity with external platforms Data Portability: Difficult to export data to other systems Customization: Minimal ability to modify workflows Enter.Health Integration
Winner: Enter.Health (broader compatibility and flexibility)
Real Customer Results Athenahealth Case Studies Family Medicine Practice (8 providers):
Implementation: 4 months Annual Cost: $120K (6% of collections) Results: 10% revenue improvement after 18 months ROI Timeline: 24 months
Orthopedic Group (12 providers):
Implementation: 6 months Annual Cost: $180K (5% of collections) Results: 15% efficiency gain after 2 years ROI Timeline: 30 months Enter.Health Case Studies Family Medicine Practice (8 providers):
Implementation: 5 weeks Annual Cost: $36K ($3 per claim) Results: 28% revenue improvement in 6 months ROI Timeline: 4 months
Orthopedic Group (12 providers):
Implementation: 7 weeks Annual Cost: $48K ($4 per claim) Results: 32% efficiency gain in 8 months ROI Timeline: 5 months Which Platform Should You Choose? Choose Athenahealth If You: Need a complete EHR replacement Want an all-in-one cloud solution Can commit to 3-5 year contracts Have a budget for 4-8% of collections Prefer established brand recognition Choose Enter.Health If You: Want to keep your existing EHR Need rapid implementation and results Prefer transparent, predictable pricing Want contract flexibility Need superior RCM performance Cost Comparison Calculator For a practice collecting $2M annually:
Savings with Enter.Health: $570K-$935K over 5 years
The Verdict: Enter.Health Wins Enter.Health is the clear winner for most healthcare providers because it delivers:
Better Financial Results 70% lower total cost than Athenahealth Higher claim acceptance rates (95-98% vs 88-92%) Faster ROI (4-6 months vs 24-30 months) Superior Implementation Experience Greater Flexibility No long-term contracts or exit fees Transparent pricing that doesn't fluctuate Easy to scale as your practice grows Ready to Switch from Athenahealth? Many practices are making the switch from Athenahealth to Enter.Health and seeing immediate improvements:
Get your free RCM assessment to see exactly how much you could save by switching to Enter.Health. Most practices discover they can:
Enter.Health is the leading specialized revenue cycle management platform, helping thousands of healthcare providers optimize their billing operations and maximize financial performance.