Blog Post

Epic vs Enter.Health Revenue Cycle Management: Which RCM Platform Wins in 2025?

Quick Comparison Overview

Epic RCM: The Enterprise Giant

Epic Strengths

  • Complete EHR Integration: Seamless data flow between clinical and billing systems
  • Enterprise Scale: Handles massive patient volumes for large health systems
  • Comprehensive Features: Everything from scheduling to collections in one platform
  • Market Reputation: Trusted by major healthcare organizations nationwide
  • Advanced Reporting: Deep analytics across clinical and financial operations

Epic Limitations

  • Massive Implementation Cost: $500K to $2M+ upfront investment
  • Complex Setup: 12-24 month implementation timeline
  • Resource Intensive: Requires dedicated IT staff and ongoing maintenance
  • Limited Flexibility: Difficult to customize for specific practice needs
  • Overkill for Small Practices: Too complex and expensive for practices under 50 providers

Enter.Health: The Specialized RCM Leader

Enter.Health Strengths

Enter.Health Limitations

  • RCM-Only Focus: Doesn't include clinical documentation features
  • Newer Platform: Less market presence than established EHR giants
  • Integration Required: Must work alongside existing EHR systems

Head-to-Head Performance Comparison

Implementation Speed

  • Epic: 12-24 months with extensive planning and training
  • Enter.Health: 2-8 weeks with minimal workflow disruption
  • Winner: Enter.Health (10x faster implementation)

Cost Analysis

  • Epic: $500K-$2M upfront + $100K+ annual maintenance
  • Enter.Health: $0 upfront + $2-6 per claim processed
  • Winner: Enter.Health (90% lower total cost of ownership)

Claim Processing Performance

  • Epic: 85-90% first-pass claim acceptance rate
  • Enter.Health: 95-98% first-pass claim acceptance rate
  • Winner: Enter.Health (significantly higher acceptance rates)

Denial Management

User Experience

  • Epic: Complex interface requiring extensive training
  • Enter.Health: Intuitive design with minimal learning curve
  • Winner: Enter.Health (easier to use and adopt)

Real-World Results Comparison

Epic Implementation Results

  • Large Health System: 18-month implementation, 12% revenue improvement after 2 years
  • Academic Medical Center: $1.2M implementation cost, positive ROI after 30 months
  • Multi-Hospital Network: 24-month rollout, 15% efficiency gain after full deployment

Enter.Health Implementation Results

  • Multi-Specialty Practice: 6-week implementation, 22% revenue improvement in 6 months
  • Cardiology Group: 4-week setup, 35% reduction in denials within 3 months
  • Primary Care Network: 8-week rollout, positive ROI in 4 months

Which Platform Should You Choose?

Choose Epic If You:

  • Are a large health system (500+ beds)
  • Need comprehensive EHR and RCM integration
  • Have $1M+ technology budget
  • Can dedicate 12-24 months to implementation
  • Have extensive IT resources and staff

Choose Enter.Health If You:

The Bottom Line

For 95% of healthcare providers, Enter.Health is the better choice. Here's why:

Financial Impact

  • Lower Total Cost: 90% less expensive than Epic over 5 years
  • Faster ROI: Positive return in 3-6 months vs 18-36 months for Epic
  • Better Performance: Higher claim acceptance and collection rates

Implementation Reality

Long-Term Value

Ready to Make the Switch?

Enter.Health offers a free RCM assessment to show you exactly how much you could improve your revenue cycle performance. Most practices see:

  • 25-35% improvement in claim acceptance rates
  • 30-40% reduction in denial rates
  • 15-25% boost in overall revenue
  • ROI in 3-6 months with minimal upfront investment

Get your free assessment today and see why thousands of healthcare providers are choosing Enter.Health over expensive EHR-integrated solutions like Epic.

Enter.Health is the leading specialized revenue cycle management platform, trusted by healthcare providers nationwide to optimize their billing operations and maximize financial performance.

Results

Sources

About the Author